Gibbs Reflective Cycle

Introduction to Gibbs Reflective Cycle

Gibbs' Reflective Cycle was created by Graham Gibbs in 1988 to give construction to gaining from encounters. It covers 6 phases:

Gibbs Reflective Cycle
  • Portrayal of the experience
  • Sentiments and considerations about the experience
  • Assessment of the experience, both great and awful
  • Examination to figure out the circumstance
  • Decision about what you realized and what you might have done any other way
  • Activity plan for how you would manage comparative circumstances later on, or general changes you could view as proper

Let’s explain each one in detail

  1. Portrayal- Here you get an opportunity to portray what is going on exhaustively. The central matters to incorporate here concern what occurred. Your sentiments and ends will come later. Supportive inquiries:
    1. What was the deal?
    2. When and where did it occur?
    3. Who was available?
  2. Sentiments- Here you can investigate any sentiments or considerations that you had during the experience and what they might have meant for the experience. Accommodating inquiries:
    1. What were you feeling during going on?
    2. What were you feeling when the circumstance?
    3. What do you suppose others were feeling about the circumstance?
  3. Assessment- Here you get an opportunity to assess what worked and what didn't work in the circumstance. Attempt to be just about as goal and genuine as could really be expected. To take advantage of your appearance center around both the positive and the negative parts of the circumstance, regardless of whether it was fundamentally either. Supportive inquiries:
    1. Why was the experience great and awful?
    2. What worked out in a good way?
    3. What went poorly?
  4. Examination- The examination step is the place where you get an opportunity to sort out what occurred. As of not long ago you have zeroed in on subtleties around what occurred in the circumstance. Presently you get an opportunity to remove importance from it. You need to focus on the various perspectives that worked out positively or ineffectively and wonder why. On the off chance that you are hoping to incorporate scholarly writing, this is the normal spot to incorporate it. Supportive inquiries:
    1. For what reason did things work out in a good way?
    2. For what reason didn't it work out positively?
    3. What sense would I be able to think about the circumstance?
  5. Ends- In this segment you can make decisions about what occurred. This is the place where you sum up your learning and feature what changes to your activities could work on the result from now on. It should be a characteristic reaction to the past segments. Accommodating inquiries:
    1. What did I gain from the present circumstance?
    2. How is it that this could have been a more certain circumstance for all interested parties?
  6. Activity plan-At this progression you plan for what you would do any other way in a comparable or related circumstance later on. It can likewise be incredibly useful to contemplate how you will take act in an unexpected way - with the end goal that you don't just arrangement what you will do any other way, yet in addition how you will ensure it occurs. At times the acknowledgment is sufficient, yet different time’s updates may be useful. Accommodating inquiries:
    1. Assuming I needed to rehash exactly the same thing, what might I do another way?
    2. How might I foster the expected abilities I want?

Conclusion

It offers a system for looking at encounters, and given its cyclic nature loans itself especially well to rehash encounters, permitting you to gain and plan from things that either worked out in a good way or went poorly. Depending on the context you are doing the reflection in, you might want use different levels of details.